New Cimzia Data Show Clinical Response and Reduced Disease Activity Among Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
The data presented were from the REALISTIC (RA Evaluation in Subjects Receiving TNF Inhibitor Certolizumab Pegol) multicenter phase IIIb study, which included a 12-week, randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled phase followed by an open-label extension (OLE) (>=16 weeks). REALISTIC was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of CZP in a broad patient population with active RA more closely resembling routine clinical practice, versus the pivotal trials, including patients with/without prior TNF-inhibitor exposure, with/without concomitant methotrexate or other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs); and varying lengths of disease duration.
The primary endpoint of an ACR20 score at week 12 was met. At Week 12, more than half (51.1%) of patients in the CZP treatment group achieved ACR20 response versus the control group (25.9%). Additional efficacy evaluated in the trial included ACR50/70 response rates, as well as the DAS28[CRP] disease activity score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) measuring physical function.
Clinical responses among patients in the CZP treatment group were rapid. ACR 20/50 responses were significantly superior to control (31.8% vs 8.5% and 9.6% vs 1.4%, p<0.001 for both) from the first time point (week 2) onwards. Significant improvements in DAS28[CRP] were reported among patients treated with CZP vs. the placebo group. In addition, CZP patients reported rapid and significant improvements in HAQ-DI vs. placebo at the first time point measured (week 2).
Similar ACR20 responses were seen across the various patient populations regardless of baseline disease duration or activity; baseline use of methotrexate; or prior use of TNF-inhibitors. ACR50 and ACR70 responses at week 12 were 26.6% and 13% for patients treated with CZP compared to the placebo group (9.9% and 2.8% respectively).
Treatment with CZP was generally well tolerated. Adverse and serious adverse event rates were comparable between CZP and placebo treatment groups with no new safety signals observed through week 12. The most common serious infections were lower respiratory tract and lung infections. The most common adverse events were infections and infestations, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and nervous system disorders.
Most read news
Topics
Organizations
Other news from the department research and development
Get the life science industry in your inbox
From now on, don't miss a thing: Our newsletter for biotechnology, pharma and life sciences brings you up to date every Tuesday and Thursday. The latest industry news, product highlights and innovations - compact and easy to understand in your inbox. Researched by us so you don't have to.