Fast-Growing Market for SNPs Products Continues to Grow
In order to benchmark the current state of SNP technologies, BioInformatics, LLC published its latest report "The Market for SNP Genotyping Products & Services." Based on a 34-question survey of more than 500 scientific customers who currently perform SNP genotyping, this report assesses researchers' experimental parameters, sample throughput levels and genotyping methods. Additionally, researchers were asked about improvements to SNP genotyping that would most benefit them as well as challenges of integrating genotyping and pharmacogenetics into clinical practice.
According to the survey, Applied Biosystems, Affymetrix and Illumina are the companies scientists most often turn to for their SNP genotyping products and services. "An interesting finding, though, is that current Applied Biosystems users were more likely than other respondents to anticipate adopting a new genotyping method to accommodate for their expected increase in throughput-which may be a reflection of researchers familiarity with the broad array of alternatives offered by the supplier. Conversely, Affymetrix's product portfolio, which is exclusively microarrays, is less suitable for use with multiple SNP genotyping methods," reported Dr. Robin Rothrock, Director of Market Research at BioInformatics, LLC.
Of all the SNP genotyping methods available, sequencing offers researchers the highest degree of specificity and selectivity due to its redundancy. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), TaqMan assays and DNA microarrays are also frequently used genotyping methods.
In addition to having a plethora of genotyping methods from which to choose, respondents are also faced with the consideration of where to do their genotyping. Over half (59%) of all SNP genotyping work is performed in-house with an almost equivalent percentage being outsourced and performed in a core facility or a collaborator's lab. The latter participants cited convenient service, the fact that they cannot justify purchase of an instrumentation platform at current throughput levels and the expertise provided by their SNP genotyping provider as the top three reasons why they outsource.
Researchers believe that decreased cost per SNP analyzed would be the most valuable future improvement to SNP genotyping. "Fortunately, detection methods for SNPs are more amenable to automation, especially for large-scale genetic analysis, which may have the added benefit of resulting in lower pricing," expects Tamara Zemlo, Ph.D., MPH, senior science advisor for BioInformatics, LLC. Overall, 53% of respondents utilize automation-an increase from 39% of respondents in a similar study conducted by BioInformatics in 2002.
When asked about the challenges of integrating SNP genotyping into clinical practice, many researchers report that the biggest setback is the lack of complete genomic solutions in chronic diseases. Other hurdles identified include the ability to demonstrate clinical utility and access to a dedicated professional team to interpret results. Translating this vision of using SNPs in pharmacogenomics to the clinic will require SNP genotyping systems that combine high throughput and accuracy with low cost per SNP analyzed.
"Scientists should look towards future system offerings that combine efficient miniaturization, a high degree of multiplexing and flexible automation to achieve these goals," predicts Zemlo.