How to improve multiple sclerosis therapy
New drugs haven’t brought about any significant improvement in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis. For a variety of reasons.
Patients suffering from progressive multiple sclerosis experience a worsening of disability in the course of their life.
© Roberto Schirdewahn
Medications currently used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) can merely reduce relapses during the initial relapsing-remitting phase. Many patients, however, develop progressive MS at a later stage, with disability becoming progressively worse. This type cannot be sufficiently treated at yet. Possible causes why an effective therapy for progressive MS is still lacking have been compiled by an international research team in a review article in the journal “Nature Reviews Drug Discovery”.
For the purpose of the study, Bochum-based medical practitioners Professor Simon Faissner and Professor Ralf Gold from the Department of Neurology at St. Josef-Hospital, University Hospital at Ruhr-Universität Bochum, collaborated with Professor V. Wee Yong from the University of Calgary and Professor Jason Plemel from the University of Alberta in Edmonton. In their article, they discuss the mechanisms underlying progressive MS as well as data regarding potential therapy approaches collated in lab experiments and clinical trials. In the process, the authors link the discussion of therapy targets with results from pharmacological studies conducted with cell culture and animal models, as well as current clinical studies.
One disease, numerous mechanisms
“A bottom line of our analysis is that the reason why it is so difficult to treat progressive MS is the fact that progression is caused by various mechanisms,” says Simon Faissner. “In order to provide more efficient treatment, we will probably need precise therapy approaches targeting various pathomechanisms.” According to the authors, another problem is the fact that the full range of underlying mechanisms is not represented in any of the existing animal models. “Therefore, identifying potential therapeutic agents for a clinical study poses a considerable challenge,” says Faissner.
Moreover, clinical studies to date have frequently followed different objectives, which means that the definition of what constitutes therapeutic success varied from study to study. The authors state that consistent criteria should ideally be implemented in order to render the studies comparable and to verify reliable treatment effects.
Financial obstacles
There are also financial aspects that impede the development of new drugs. There is evidence that drugs approved for another indication may also prove effective against multiple sclerosis. “But as patents for such medication have expired, pharmaceutical companies can’t further develop them,” explains Simon Faissner. “The implementation of studies to test the efficacy of those drugs for MS often fails due to a lack of funds.”
Better therapy possible
Nevertheless, the authors conclude that the treatment of patients suffering from progressive MS will improve, as researchers gain a better and more detailed understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms. “These findings will enable us to introduce a more targeted therapy that will prevent patients from suffering more severe impairments as the disease progresses,” predicts Faissner.
Original publication
Other news from the department science
Get the life science industry in your inbox
From now on, don't miss a thing: Our newsletter for biotechnology, pharma and life sciences brings you up to date every Tuesday and Thursday. The latest industry news, product highlights and innovations - compact and easy to understand in your inbox. Researched by us so you don't have to.
