Needleman-Wunsch algorithm

The Needleman–Wunsch algorithm performs a global alignment on two sequences (called A and B here). It is commonly used in bioinformatics to align protein or nucleotide sequences. The algorithm was proposed in 1970 by Saul Needleman and Christian Wunsch in their paper A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins, J Mol Biol. 48(3):443-53.

Additional recommended knowledge

Correct Test Weight Handling Guide: 12 Practical Tips

How to ensure accurate weighing results every day?

Safe Weighing Range Ensures Accurate Results

The Needleman–Wunsch algorithm is an example of dynamic programming, and was the first application of dynamic programming to biological sequence comparison.

Scores for aligned characters are specified by a similarity matrix. Here, S(i,j) is the similarity of characters i and j. It uses a linear gap penalty, here called d.

For example, if the similarity matrix was

then the alignment:

  AGACTAGTTAC
  CGA---GACGT

with a gap penalty of -5, would have the following score...

To find the alignment with the highest score, a two-dimensional array (or matrix) is allocated. This matrix is often called the F matrix, and its (i,j)th entry is often denoted F_ij There is one column for each character in sequence A, and one row for each character in sequence B. Thus, if we are aligning sequences of sizes n and m, the running time of the algorithm is O(nm) and the amount of memory used is in O(nm). (However, there is a modified version of the algorithm which uses only O(m + n) space, at the cost of a higher running time. This modification is in fact a general technique which applies to many dynamic programming algorithms; this method was introduced in Hirschberg's algorithm for solving the longest common subsequence problem.)

As the algorithm progresses, the F_ij will be assigned to be the optimal score for the alignment of the first i characters in A and the first j characters in B. The principle of optimality is then applied as follows.

  Basis:
  F0j = d * j
  Fi0 = d * i
  Recursion, based on the principle of optimality:
  Fij = max(Fi − 1,j − 1 + S(Ai − 1,Bj − 1),Fi,j − 1 + d,Fi − 1,j + d)

The pseudo-code for the algorithm to compute the F matrix therefore looks like this (array and sequence indexes start at 0):

  for i=0 to length(A)-1
    F(i,0) <- d*i
  for j=0 to length(B)-1
    F(0,j) <- d*j
  for i=1 to length(A)
    for j = 1 to length(B)
    {
      Choice1 <- F(i-1,j-1) + S(A(i), B(j))
      Choice2 <- F(i-1, j) + d
      Choice3 <- F(i, j-1) + d
      F(i,j) <- max(Choice1, Choice2, Choice3)
    }

Once the F matrix is computed, note that the bottom right hand corner of the matrix is the maximum score for any alignments. To compute which alignment actually gives this score, you can start from the bottom right cell, and compare the value with the three possible sources(Choice1, Choice2, and Choice3 above) to see which it came from. If Choice1, then A(i) and B(i) are aligned, if Choice2, then A(i) is aligned with a gap, and if Choice3, then B(i) is aligned with a gap.

  AlignmentA <- ""
  AlignmentB <- ""
  i <- length(A)
  j <- length(B)
  while (i > 0 AND j > 0)
  {
    Score <- F(i,j)
    ScoreDiag <- F(i - 1, j - 1)
    ScoreUp <- F(i, j - 1)
    ScoreLeft <- F(i - 1, j)
    if (Score == ScoreDiag + S(A(i-1), B(j-1)))
    {
      AlignmentA <- A(i-1) + AlignmentA
      AlignmentB <- B(j-1) + AlignmentB
      i <- i - 1
      j <- j - 1
    }
    else if (Score == ScoreLeft + d)
    {
      AlignmentA <- A(i-1) + AlignmentA
      AlignmentB <- "-" + AlignmentB
      i <- i - 1
    }
    otherwise (Score == ScoreUp + d)
    {
      AlignmentA <- "-" + AlignmentA
      AlignmentB <- B(j-1) + AlignmentB
      j <- j - 1
    }
  }
  while (i > 0)
  {
    AlignmentA <- A(i-1) + AlignmentA
    AlignmentB <- "-" + AlignmentB
    i <- i - 1
  }
  while (j > 0)
  {
    AlignmentA <- "-" + AlignmentA
    AlignmentB <- B(j-1) + AlignmentB
    j <- j - 1
  }

See also

• Smith-Waterman algorithm
• BLAST
• Levenshtein distance
• Dynamic time warping